Criminal Sanctions Against Narcotics Abuse for Himself Associated with Article 127 Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics

Anthoni Hutabarat; Rr. Dijan  Widijowati

doi:10.54783/endlessjournal.v6i2.157

Authors

Anthoni Hutabarat Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia
Rr. Dijan Widijowati Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v6i2.157

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze Criminal Sanctions Against Narcotics Abuse for Himself Associated with Article 127 Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics. The type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, namely viewing and analyzing from the point of view of laws and regulations that apply, especially those related to the problems in this study. The results of the research that the mistake of imposing prison sentences on narcotics abusers occurred since the enactment of Law Number 22 of 1997 concerning Narcotics until now has not changed, even though the Narcotics Law changed to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, explicitly stating the purpose of making the law is "guaranteeing drug abusers get rehabilitation efforts The guarantee of the Narcotics Law is contained in article 55 j.o article 128, namely abusers are required by law to carry out mandatory reporting of addicts to IPWL to obtain rehabilitation services and abusers related to the court are terminated or determined by a judge to receive a rehabilitation sentence. Rehabilitation services through compulsory reporting of addicts are in fact not implemented properly.

References

Bacon, M. (2022). Desistance from Criminalisation: Police Culture and New Directions in Drugs Policing. Policing and Society, 32(4), 522-539.

Collins, J. (2020). A Brief History of Cannabis and the Drug Conventions. American Journal of International Law, 114, 279-284.

Colson, R., & Bergeron, H. (2020). Western and Central Europe: Towards a Cohesive Model for drug policies?. In Research handbook on international drug policy (pp. 94-112). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Del Pozo, B., & Beletsky, L. (2020). No “Back to Normal” after COVID-19 for Our Failed Drug Policies. International Journal of Drug Policy, 83, 102901.

Earp, B. D., Lewis, J., Hart, C. L., & with Bioethicists and Allied Professionals for Drug Policy Reform. (2021). Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(4), 4-19.

Ekhtiari, H., Noroozi, A., Farhoudian, A., Radfar, S. R., Hajebi, A., Sefatian, S., ... & Rawson, R. (2020). The Evolution of Addiction Treatment and Harm Reduction Programs in Iran: A Chaotic Response or a Synergistic Diversity?. Addiction, 115(7), 1395-1403.

Enghoff, O., & Aldridge, J. (2019). The Value of Unsolicited Online Data in Drug Policy Research. International Journal of Drug Policy, 73, 210-218.

Farahmand, P., Arshed, A., & Bradley, M. V. (2020). Systemic Racism and Substance Use Disorders. Psychiatric Annals, 50(11), 494-498.

Friedman, B., & Pattillo, M. (2019). Statutory Inequality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Law. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 174-196.

Gallagher, J. R., Nordberg, A., Marlowe, D. B., Zongrone, C., & Szymanowski, S. (2022). A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of Women’s Experiences in Drug Court: Promoting Recovery in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 22(3), 212-232.

Kenny, P. D., & Holmes, R. (2020). A New Penal Populism? Rodrigo Duterte, Public Opinion, and the War on Drugs in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 20(2), 187-205.

Kim, J. W., Morgan, E., & Nyhan, B. (2020). Treatment Versus Punishment: Understanding Racial Inequalities in DRUG POLICY. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(2), 177-209.

Klein, A. (2019). Drug Problem or Medicrime? Distribution and Use of Falsified Tramadol Medication in Egypt and West Africa. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(1), 52-62.

Kozhimannil, K. B., Dowd, W. N., Ali, M. M., Novak, P., & Chen, J. (2019). Substance Use Disorder Treatment Admissions and State-Level Prenatal Substance Use Policies: Evidence from a National Treatment Database. Addictive behaviors, 90, 272-277.

Kramer, J. M. (2019). Drug Abuse in the USSR. In Soviet social problems (pp. 94-118). Routledge.

Logan, M. W., & Link, N. W. (2019). Taking Stock of Drug Courts: Do They Work?. Victims & Offenders, 14(3), 283-298.

Minhee, C., & Calandrillo, S. (2019). The Cure for America's Opioid Crisis: End the War on Drugs. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 42, 547.

Porter, N. D. (2020). Top Trends in Criminal Justice Reform. The Sentencing Project.

Ramadani, S., Danil, E., Sabri, F., & Zurnetti, A. (2021). Criminal Law Politics on Regulation of Criminal Actions in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1373-1380.

Simbulan, N., Estacio, L., Dioquino-Maligaso, C., Herbosa, T., & Withers, M. (2019). The Manila Declaration on the Drug Problem in the Philippines. Annals of Global Health, 85(1).

Sugihartati, R., & Susilo, D. (2019). Acts Against Drugs and Narcotics Abuse: Measurement of the Effectiveness Campaign on Indonesian Narcotics Regulator Instagram. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 8, 1-4.

Swinburne, M., & Hoke, K. (2019). State Efforts to Creative an Inclusive Marijuana Industry in the Shadow of the Unjust War on Drugs. J. Bus. & Tech. L., 15, 235.

Tham, H. (2021). On the Possible Deconstruction of the Swedish Drug Policy. Retreat or entrenchment, 129-158.

Tumanggor, F., Muazzul, M., & Zulyadi, R. (2019). Handling of Narcotics Child Victims in Child Special Coaching Institutions Class I Tanjung Gusta, Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 2(4), 50-55.

Zulyadi, R. (2020). Obstacle Factors on Evidence System of Urine Test Result on Drugs Cases in National Narcotics Board of North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(2), 1316-1324.