Crisis Handling and Conflict Resolution in Papuan and Local Communities in Demonstration Cases Commemorating the 2019 New York Agreement


  • Habibi Za’idatul Ma’muriyah Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Maulina Pia Wulandari Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Bambang Dwi Prasetyo Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia



Conflicts and crises are situations that cannot be predicted, can come at any time, and cannot be avoided, so crises management actions and conflict resolution are needed from demonstration conflicts to commemorate the New York Agreement in August 2019 in Malang City. The situation that occurs is a government crisis situation that requires conflict resolution and crisis management by Malang City so that crises and conflicts can be muted so that they do not continue. The research to see how Malang City handles this crisis and conflict resolution uses a constructivist paradigm with a qualitative research type. This study aims to find strategies to reduce crises and reduce ongoing conflicts. The method of data collection carried out in this study was an interview with the Public Relations of Malang City Government, supported by data collection, which was carried out through documentation. The Apologia theory and the conflict theory used in this study show that Malang City uses the deny strategy, conciliation strategy, transcendence strategy, and bolstering strategy. Malang City Government also conducts negotiations and acts with the Papuan people who live in Malang, so the strategies used are conflict resolution and crisis management strategies that produce win-win solutions so that conflicts are reduced and not prolonged.


Aminudin, M. (2019). Ini Sederet Tindakan Anarkis Mahasiswa Papua di Malang Saat akan Demo. Retrieved from:

Butterick, K. (2012). Pengantar Public Relations: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Coombs, W. T. (2007a). Crisis Management and Communications. Institute for Public Relations, (December), 1–14.

Coombs, W. T. (2007b). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing and responding, second edition. In Physician Sportsmedicine.

Cutlip, S., Center, A., & Broom, G. (2009). Effective Public Relations. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Falkheimer, J. (2013). Crisis Communication and Terrorism: The Norway Attacks on 22 July 2011. Corporate Communications, 19(1), 52–63.

Hearit, K. M. (2009). Mistakes Were Made: Organizations, Apologia, and Crises of Social Legitimacy. (January 2015), 37–41.

Kriyantono, R. (2014a). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2012). Essentials of negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.

Millet, J. D. (1954). Management in the public service: The quest for effective performance. McGraw-Hill.

Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moore, P., & Moore, W. (2005). Menguasai CRM (Manajemen hubungan Konsumen) dalam seminggu. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.

Novri, S. (2009). Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Rosenthal, U., & Kouzmin, A. (1997). Crises and crisis management: Toward comprehensive government decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 277–304.

Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On The Generic Criticism of Apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(3), 273–283.




How to Cite

Ma’muriyah, H. Z. ., Wulandari, M. P. ., & Prasetyo, B. D. . (2022). Crisis Handling and Conflict Resolution in Papuan and Local Communities in Demonstration Cases Commemorating the 2019 New York Agreement. ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES, 5(1), 205–214.