Implementation of Good Governance in public services in Blanakan District, Subang Regency

Endang Try  Setyasih

Authors

Endang Try Setyasih Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Sumedang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Good Governance, Public Service, Corruption Collusion Nepotism, Human Resources.

Abstract

Good governance is an important governance principle in the implementation of public services. The Blanakan District Government has an important role in ensuring good governance practices are properly implemented. This study aims to examine good governance practices in public services in the Blanakan sub-district, Subang Regency with a qualitative approach method, with data collection techniques through interviews and observation. The results of the study show that good governance practices in Blanakan District have been running optimally, especially in terms of transparency and public participation in decision making. In an effort to improve the quality of public services, it is necessary to improve good governance practices in Blanakan District, such as prevention and prosecution and the quality of the human resources of the apparatus. This research can provide input for the government and society in improving good governance practices in public services in Blanakan District, Subang Regency, and can be used as a reference for future researchers in studying good governance practices in public services.

References

Akbar, Y., & Karim, A. (2019). The implementation of good governance principles in Indonesia: A case study of regional autonomy. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(2), 20-31.

Alamsyah, H., & Daulay, R. M. (2016). Evaluating good governance in local governments in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 6(1), 1-12.

Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M., & McKee, M. (2020). The effects of administrative burden reduction on tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Minnesota. National Tax Journal, 73(4), 911-942.

Asian Development Bank. (2018). Good governance in public service delivery. Mandaluyong City, Philippine. Asian Development Bank.

Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. (2019). Public sector economics. London, UK: Routledge.

Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(9), 1-11.

Cheema, G. S. (2007). State of governance: Toward a framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 14-18.

European Commission. (2018). Good governance for development: A conceptual framework. Brussels. Belgium: European Commission.

Frederickson, H. G. (2018). Ethics and public administration. London, UK: Routledge.

Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Garg, M., & Garg, A. (2020). Good governance, corruption, and economic growth: International evidence. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(8), 1036-1056.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Huther, J., & Shah, A. (2016). Anti-corruption policies and programs: A framework for evaluation. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 744-755.

Kim, S. (2017). The effectiveness of public service delivery in a developing country: Evidence from a nationwide citizen satisfaction survey in Indonesia. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 279-299.

Klijn, E. H. (2018). Complexity theory and public management: A review and assessment. Public Administration, 96(3), 503-519.

Kristian, I. (2019). Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Secara Terpadu dan Berkelanjutan Yang Berbasis Masyarakat. Jurnal RASI, 1(1), 49–63

Kristian, I. (2019). Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan.

Kristian, I. (2021). Perlukah Konservasi Moral?. Jurnal RASI, 2(1), 40–53.

Kuncoro, M., & Resosudarmo, B. P. (2016). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across Indonesian provinces. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(1), 249-262.

Lewis, D., & Kanji, N. (2009). Non-governmental organizations and development. London. UK: Routledge.

Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (2019). Governance and governance networks in contemporary public administration. New York, NY: Routledge.

Maulidiah, S. (2014). Pelayanan Publik, Pelayanan Terpadu Administrasi Kecamatan (PATEN).

Mendoza, R. U., & Ramiro, R. (2017). Enhancing government responsiveness through e-governance in the Philippines. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(4), 18-30.

Moleong, L. J. (2001). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nishimura, Y. (2019). Citizen participation and public service delivery: Evidence from Indonesia. International Public Management Journal, 22(2), 269-290.

OECD. (2019). Good governance in the public sector: Consultation draft for the revision of the OECD principles of public governance. Paris, France: OECD.

Suharto, E., & Huda, M. (2017). The impact of decentralization and good governance on public service delivery in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Public Finance, 3(2), 51-62.

Syarief, M. (2020). Optimalisasi Pemutakhiran Kode dan Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintahan (WAP) Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah di Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. JURNAL CAPITAL: Kebijakan Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2(2), 1-19.

United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Governance for sustainable development: Integrating governance in the post-2015 development agenda. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.

World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. Washington, DC: World Bank.