Digital Transformation in Public Sector: Case Study on Licensing Services to Start a Business in Pekalongan City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v6i2.173Keywords:
Information Technology, Public Sector, Public Services.Abstract
This study had two formulated objectives. First, this study wanted to evaluate the achievements of the digital transformation process in licensing services to start a business in Pekalongan City, Central Java, Indonesia. Second, this study also expected to identify the factors that influenced the achievement of the digital transformation process in licensing services to start a business in Pekalongan City. This study used qualitative approach to answer the problem formulation through a case study. Data and information were analyzed using chronological time series analysis techniques. The informants of this research were selected through the snowball method. The results of data and information analysis showed that Pekalongan City was at the e-government stage. Three reasons that justified that the achievement was not at the digital government stage. First, users or citizens had not voiced demand in the digital transformation process. Second, the transformation of internal work processes had not yet taken place. Third, there had not been a shared database sharing process between related agencies either within the Pekalongan City government environment or with central government agencies. The analysis also showed that five factors that influenced the process of digital transformation in licensing services to start a business in Pekalongan City, those were: strategic factors, digital cultural factors, leadership factors, human resource capacity factors, and the role factor of central government organizations.
References
Akesson, M., Skalen, P., & Edvardsson, B. (2008). E-Government and Service Orientation: Gaps between Theory and Practice. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810846122.
Al-Shbail, T., & Aman, A. (2018). E-Government and Accountability: How to Mitigate the Disorders and Dysfunctions of Accountability Relationships. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(2), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2017-0057.
Al-wazir, A. A., & Zheng, Z. (2012). E-Government Development in Yemen: Assessment and Solutions. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(4), 512–518.
Asogwa, B. E. (2013). Electronic Government as a Paradigm Shift for Efficient Public Services: Opportunities and Challenges for Nigerian Government. Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311303985.
Bason, Christian. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. United Kingdom: The Policy Press University of Bristol.
Benjamin, K., & Potts, H. W. (2018). Digital Transformation in Government: Lessons for Digital Health? Digital Health, 3, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618759168.
Eggers, W. D., & Bellman, J. (2015). The Journey to Government’s Digital Transformation. In Deloitte University Press.
Jonathan, G. M. (2019). Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: Identifying Critical Succes Factors. In M. Themistocleous & M. Papadaki (Eds.). Information System (pp. 223–235). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1.
Kemenpan RB. (2018). Pedoman Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Indonesia.
Kellerman, B. (2012). The End of Leadership. United Stated Of America: Harper Business.
Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2019). The E-Government Paradox in Post-Soviet Countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173.
Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (2013). Examining the Relationships among E-Government Maturity, Corruption, Economic Prosperity and Environmental Degradation: A Cross-Country Analysis. Information and Management, 50(8), 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003.
Kumar, R., Sachan, A., Mukherjee, A., & Kumar, R. (2018). Factors Influencing E-Government Adoption in India: A Qualitative Approach. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(5), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-02-2018-0007.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government : A Four Stage Model. 18, 122–136.
Lee, C. P., Chang, K., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x.
Manoharan, A. (2013). A Three Dimensional Assessment of U.S. County e-Government. State & Local Government Review, 45(3), 153–162.
Manoharan, A. P., & Ingrams, A. (2018). Conceptualizing E-Government from Local Government Perspectives. State and Local Government Review, 50(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x18763964.
Mantovani, G. (1994). Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically Apt to Enhance Democracy in Organizations? Human Relations, 47(1).
Martin, & Goggin. (2016). Digital Transformations?: Gendering the End User in Digital Government Policy. Journal of Information Policy, 6(2016), 436. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0436.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.
Moon, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations ? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations ? Unexpected Results from a. 12(2), 273–291.
Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local E-Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x.
OECD. (2016). Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas. In Oecd. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3689939.
Petrakaki, D. (2018). Re-locating Accountability through Technology: From Bureaucratic to Electronic Ways of Governing Public Sector Work. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2017-0043.
NIPA. (2016). Kajian Pengukuran Indeks Kompleksitas dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta_Indonesia.
Riyatno. (2016). Bahan Paparan dengan Judul "Kebijakan Penyederhanaan Pelayanan Perizinan di Bidang Penanaman Modal" Disampaikan dalam Kegiatan FGD di Lembaga Administrasi Negara 22 Juni 2016.
Shakya, R. K. (2017). e-Government Procurement (e-GP). In F. A (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5.
Siddiquee, N. A. (2016). E-Government and Transformation of Service Delivery in Developing Countries: The Bangladesh Experience and Lessons. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(3), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2015-0039.
Suhardi, Sofia, A., & Andriyanto, A. (2015). Evaluating E-Government and Good Governance Correlation. Journal of ICT Research and Applications, 9(3), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2015.9.3.3.
Susanto, T. D., & Aljoza, M. (2015). Individual Acceptance of e-Government Services in a Developing Country: Dimensions of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use and the Importance of Trust and Social Influence. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.171.
Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Implementation and Its Effect on Red Tape E-Government and Bureaucracy : Toward a Better Understanding of Intranet Implementation and Its Effect on Red Tape. 17(3).
World Bank. (2014). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2015.
World Bank. (2015). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2016.
World Bank. (2016). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2017.
World Bank. (2017). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2018.
World Bank. (2018). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2019.
World Bank. (2019). Laporan Ease of Doing Business 2020.
Yin. Robert K. (2014). Studi Kasus : Desain & Metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Yulk, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations (Seventh Ed). New jersey: Prentice Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
