Religious Norms vs Constitutional Supremacy: A Socio-Constitutional Review in Muslim-Majority Countries

Iskandar Syukur

doi:10.54783/endlessjournal.v7i3.354

Authors

Iskandar Syukur Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v7i3.354

Keywords:

Religious Norms, Constitutional Supremacy, Muslim-Majority Countries, State Governance, Law and Society.

Abstract

The tension between religious norms and constitutional supremacy is a persistent issue in state administration practices in Muslim-majority countries. These two sources of legitimacy often coexist in the legal system, creating a space for interaction that is not always harmonious. This situation is influenced by social, political, and institutional factors that shape the ongoing direction of legal regulation. This study aims to analyze the configuration of the relationship between religious norms and constitutional supremacy and its implications for state governance and public life. This research uses a qualitative approach utilizing secondary data obtained from various relevant sources, including previous studies and legal documents. The results show that the relationship between religious norms and the constitution is formed through diverse patterns and is influenced by the role of state institutions and socio-political pressures. This interaction impacts the consistency of legal application, the protection of citizens' rights, and the balance between diversity and unity of law. The state's ability to manage this relationship proportionally is a crucial factor in maintaining social stability and government legitimacy.

References

Atalay, Z. (2019). Partners in patriarchy: Faith-based organizations and neoliberalism in Turkey. Critical Sociology, 45(3), 431-445.

Casey, C., & Kenny, D. (2022). The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law. International journal of constitutional law, 20(2), 664-695.

Chandranegara, I. S., & Cahyawati, D. P. (2023). Conflict of interest prevention clause in the constitution: The study of the Indonesian Constitution. Heliyon, 9(3).

Dollahite, D. C., Marks, L. D., Babcock, K. P., Barrow, B. H., & Rose, A. H. (2019). Beyond religious rigidities: Religious firmness and religious flexibility as complementary loyalties in faith transmission. Religions, 10(2), 111.

Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2020). Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework. Land Use Policy, 99, 105080.

Faude, B., & Groβe-Kreul, F. (2020). Let's justify! How regime complexes enhance the normative legitimacy of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 431-439.

Gele, A. A., Musse, F. K., Shrestha, M., & Qureshi, S. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study. PloS one, 15(3), e0229916.

Golia, A. J., & Teubner, G. (2021). Societal constitutionalism: Background, theory, debates. ICL Journal, 15(4), 357-411.

Gray, I., & Cointet, J. P. (2023). Multilateralism of the marginal: Least developed countries and international climate negotiations, 1995–2016. American Journal of Sociology, 129(3), 796-855.

Hambali, H. R., Rusmana, D., Susanti, S. S., Khermarinah, K., & Fakhrurrazi, F. (2022). Islamic religious education teachers’ strategies in fostering students’ religious values in madrasah. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6511-6516.

Kamran, M., & Putri, M. A. (2023). Political Form and Sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia: State of Law or State of Power. Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(1), 351-358.

Khabrieva, T. Y. (2020). Constitutional reform in Russia: Searching for national identity. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 90(3), 273-282.

Khaitan, T. (2019). Constitutional directives: Morally‐committed political constitutionalism. The Modern Law Review, 82(4), 603-632.

Koskenniemi, M. (2019). Imagining the Rule of Law: Rereading the Grotian ‘Tradition’. European Journal of International Law, 30(1), 17-52.

Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP).

Mende, J. (2021). Are human rights western—And why does it matter? A perspective from international political theory. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(1), 38-57.

Modood, T., & Sealy, T. (2021). Freedom of religion and the accommodation of religious diversity: Multiculturalising secularism. Religions, 12(10), 868.

Mohd Dali, N. R. S., Yousafzai, S., & Abdul Hamid, H. (2019). Religiosity scale development. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(1), 227-248.

Pech, L. (2022). The rule of law as a well-established and well-defined principle of EU law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(2), 107-138.

Sajir, Z. (2023). A post-secular approach to managing diversity in liberal democracies: exploring the interplay of human rights, religious identity, and inclusive governance in Western societies. Religions, 14(10), 1325.

Schnabel, L., Abdelhadi, E., Ally Zaslavsky, K., Ho, J. S., & Torres‐Beltran, A. (2022). Gender, sexuality, and religion: A critical integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 61(2), 271-292.

Spieker, L. D. (2020). Framing and managing constitutional identity conflicts: how to stabilize the modus vivendi between the Court of Justice and national constitutional courts. Common Market Law Review, 57(2).

Susilawati, S., Yasin, A. F., Rahmaniah, A., Chakim, A., & Supriyatno, T. (2022). Strategy to internalizing religious moral values in the learning process in higher education. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 399-408.

Voigt, S. (2021). Mind the gap: Analyzing the divergence between constitutional text and constitutional reality. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(5), 1778-1809.

Zhou, H. R. (2019). Legal principles, constitutional principles, and judicial review. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(4), 899-930.