Implementation of the Utilization of West Lampung Traditional Cultural Expression in the Legal System Perspective of Intellectual Property

Erlina B.; Zainab Ompu Jainah; Melisa  Safitri; Intan Nurina  Seftiniara

doi:10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i3.99

Authors

Erlina B. Faculty of Law, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Zainab Ompu Jainah Faculty of Law, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Melisa Safitri Faculty of Law, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Intan Nurina Seftiniara Faculty of Law, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i3.99

Abstract

The embodiment of West Lampung Traditional Cultural Expressions has not been optimal both in terms of intellectual property protection and in terms of its usefulness for the local community of West Lampung. In this article, we will discuss how intellectual property legal protection is implemented if it is implemented in the protection of traditional cultural expressions and how far has the West Lampung Regency Government tried to protect and utilize the potential of traditional cultural expressions. This article aims to identify a model of protection against traditional cultural expressions in West Lampung by using normative and empirical legal research methodologies. The results of the discussion show that the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions is carried out based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Law Number 5 of 2017 concerning the Advancement of Culture, Law Number 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Conservation and Government Regulation Number 6 of 2017. 2015 concerning Museums, and Regulation of the Minister of Culture Number 106 concerning Indonesian Intangible Cultural Heritage in addition to the autonomy of the Regional Government of West Lampung Regency has also made efforts to preserve istiadar custom through the Regional Regulation of West Lampung Regency Number 14 of 2000 concerning the Guidance, Preservation, and Development of Indigenous Peoples. and Customary Institutions. The West Lampung Regency Government also seeks to protect and preserve traditional cultural expressions by participating in activities such as traditional festivals organized by the Lampung Provincial Government so that the existence of traditional cultural expressions in West Lampung Regency is known to the public. However, overall the protection of the majority of traditional cultural expressions has not been inventoried and utilized optimally, including the traditional cultural expressions of West Lampung. There should be immediate efforts to regulate the protection of traditional cultural expressions in a sui generis manner apart from the Copyright Law.

References

Absori, M., Dimyati, K., & Wardiono, K. (2008). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Melalui Lembaga Alternatif. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 20(2), 367-382.

Antons, C. (2013). Asian borderlands and the legal protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Modern Asian Studies, 47(4), 1403-1433.

Atsar, A. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Law Reform, 13(2), 284-299.

Aubert, V. (1967). Some social functions of legislation. Acta sociologica, 10(1-2), 97-120.

Bentham, J. (2016). The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bently , L., & Brad Sherman, B. (2009). Intellectual Property. UK: Oxford University.

Campos, A. S. (2014). Aquinas's" lex iniusta non est lex": a Test of Legal Validity. ARSP: Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 366-378.

Dölling, D., Entorf, H., Hermann, D., & Rupp, T. (2009). Is deterrence effective? Results of a meta-analysis of punishment. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1), 201-224.

Feinberg, J. (1989). The Right to Disobey. Michigan Law Review, 6.

Husamah, H. (2016). Mengusung Kembali Khazanah Identitas Budaya Bangsa. Jurnal Bestari, (42).

Kreps, D. M. (1997). Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives. The American Economic Review, 87(2).

Kretzmann, N. (1988). Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas’ Court of Conscience. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 99.

Li, L. (2014). Intellectual Property System: Is It Enough to Protect Folklore?. In Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions (pp. 35-60). Springer, Cham.

Lewinski, S. V. (2004). Indigenous heritage and intellectual property. Genetic Resources, Tradi.

Long, E. D. (2006). Traditional Knowledge and The Fight for The Public Domain. John Marshall Rev Intellectual Property Law, 5.

Merryman, J. H. (1986). Two ways of thinking about cultural property. American journal of international law, 80(4), 831-853.

Pound, R. (1910). Law in Books and Law in Actions. American Law Review, 44.

Pound, R. (1954). The Lawyer as Social Engineer. Journal of Public Law, 3.

Rahayu, D. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Motif Batik Tanjungbumi Madura. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 23(1), 115-131.

Sakul, P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Warisan Budaya Batik Bangsa Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Lex Privatum, 8(3), 184–192.

Soekanto, S. (1976). Masalah-Masalah di Sekitar Perundang-Undangan (Suatu Tinjauan Menurut Sosiologi Hukum). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 6(1), 27-34.

WIPO. (2003). Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions. WIPO Doc WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/3.

WIPO. (2001). Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998– 1999). Geneva: WIPO.

Zhang, G. (2007). Research on intellectual property protection of folklore. Beijing: Law Press China.